Foros para vendedores
Iniciar sesión
Iniciar sesión
imgIniciar sesión
imgIniciar sesión
user profile
Seller_brIdGxsJ2XFfb

Items Lost on Inbound, damaged and Lost Reimburesement

According to Amazon's new policy, reimbursements for items lost or damaged during inbound shipments are now based on Amazon’s own assessed cost prices, rather than the invoices I submit. Previously, Amazon reimbursed us based on the selling price, which was fair—after all, as sellers, we invest money with the expectation of earning a profit.

It doesn't seem right that Amazon has unilaterally shifted to using its own internal valuations, especially when these don't reflect our actual costs. If the issue lies within Amazon’s system, they should take full responsibility and reimburse inventory losses based on the earlier, more reasonable policy—not at a value they've decided without our input. It's frustrating that I'm not even being reimbursed my true cost, let alone any profit. How is that fair or justifiable?

Case IDs:

  • 17587828791
  • 17543983011
  • 17585037591

18 visualizaciones
4 respuestas
Etiquetas:Centro logístico, Envío extraviado, Gestión logística, Logística de Amazon
00
Responder
user profile
Seller_brIdGxsJ2XFfb

Items Lost on Inbound, damaged and Lost Reimburesement

According to Amazon's new policy, reimbursements for items lost or damaged during inbound shipments are now based on Amazon’s own assessed cost prices, rather than the invoices I submit. Previously, Amazon reimbursed us based on the selling price, which was fair—after all, as sellers, we invest money with the expectation of earning a profit.

It doesn't seem right that Amazon has unilaterally shifted to using its own internal valuations, especially when these don't reflect our actual costs. If the issue lies within Amazon’s system, they should take full responsibility and reimburse inventory losses based on the earlier, more reasonable policy—not at a value they've decided without our input. It's frustrating that I'm not even being reimbursed my true cost, let alone any profit. How is that fair or justifiable?

Case IDs:

  • 17587828791
  • 17543983011
  • 17585037591

Etiquetas:Centro logístico, Envío extraviado, Gestión logística, Logística de Amazon
00
18 visualizaciones
4 respuestas
Responder
4 respuestas
user profile
Seller_Qbd0RsfZFEZBY
En respuesta a la publicación de Seller_brIdGxsJ2XFfb

user profile
Seller_brIdGxsJ2XFfb
Previously, Amazon reimbursed us based on the selling price, which was fair
Ver publicación
user profile
Seller_brIdGxsJ2XFfb
I'm not even being reimbursed my true cost, let alone any profit. How is that fair or justifiable?
Ver publicación

Im not sure if it was how you were raised or where you live but your expectation of "fairness" and actions needing "justification" are detached from reality. You can like it or not like it, it doesnt matter, thats how it is. Facts dont care about feelings.

Now, that being said loss is normal in business. If you had a physical store it would be theft or fraud. When using a third party for logistics its "missing from inbound" and "lost/damaged in warehouse". This is true across the board, its not an Amazon thing, its a 3PL thing.

My recommendation is to build it into your pricing like every other retailer.

Opening multiple cases for the same issue will likely delay the issue being resolved as each subsequent issue "sends you to the back of the line" and can be viewed as manipulating the case system which can add severe delays.

00
Sigue esta conversación para recibir notificaciones cuando haya nueva actividad
user profile
Seller_brIdGxsJ2XFfb

Items Lost on Inbound, damaged and Lost Reimburesement

According to Amazon's new policy, reimbursements for items lost or damaged during inbound shipments are now based on Amazon’s own assessed cost prices, rather than the invoices I submit. Previously, Amazon reimbursed us based on the selling price, which was fair—after all, as sellers, we invest money with the expectation of earning a profit.

It doesn't seem right that Amazon has unilaterally shifted to using its own internal valuations, especially when these don't reflect our actual costs. If the issue lies within Amazon’s system, they should take full responsibility and reimburse inventory losses based on the earlier, more reasonable policy—not at a value they've decided without our input. It's frustrating that I'm not even being reimbursed my true cost, let alone any profit. How is that fair or justifiable?

Case IDs:

  • 17587828791
  • 17543983011
  • 17585037591

18 visualizaciones
4 respuestas
Etiquetas:Centro logístico, Envío extraviado, Gestión logística, Logística de Amazon
00
Responder
user profile
Seller_brIdGxsJ2XFfb

Items Lost on Inbound, damaged and Lost Reimburesement

According to Amazon's new policy, reimbursements for items lost or damaged during inbound shipments are now based on Amazon’s own assessed cost prices, rather than the invoices I submit. Previously, Amazon reimbursed us based on the selling price, which was fair—after all, as sellers, we invest money with the expectation of earning a profit.

It doesn't seem right that Amazon has unilaterally shifted to using its own internal valuations, especially when these don't reflect our actual costs. If the issue lies within Amazon’s system, they should take full responsibility and reimburse inventory losses based on the earlier, more reasonable policy—not at a value they've decided without our input. It's frustrating that I'm not even being reimbursed my true cost, let alone any profit. How is that fair or justifiable?

Case IDs:

  • 17587828791
  • 17543983011
  • 17585037591

Etiquetas:Centro logístico, Envío extraviado, Gestión logística, Logística de Amazon
00
18 visualizaciones
4 respuestas
Responder
user profile

Items Lost on Inbound, damaged and Lost Reimburesement

por parte de Seller_brIdGxsJ2XFfb

According to Amazon's new policy, reimbursements for items lost or damaged during inbound shipments are now based on Amazon’s own assessed cost prices, rather than the invoices I submit. Previously, Amazon reimbursed us based on the selling price, which was fair—after all, as sellers, we invest money with the expectation of earning a profit.

It doesn't seem right that Amazon has unilaterally shifted to using its own internal valuations, especially when these don't reflect our actual costs. If the issue lies within Amazon’s system, they should take full responsibility and reimburse inventory losses based on the earlier, more reasonable policy—not at a value they've decided without our input. It's frustrating that I'm not even being reimbursed my true cost, let alone any profit. How is that fair or justifiable?

Case IDs:

  • 17587828791
  • 17543983011
  • 17585037591

Etiquetas:Centro logístico, Envío extraviado, Gestión logística, Logística de Amazon
00
18 visualizaciones
4 respuestas
Responder
4 respuestas
4 respuestas
Filtros rápidos
Ordenar por
user profile
Seller_Qbd0RsfZFEZBY
En respuesta a la publicación de Seller_brIdGxsJ2XFfb

user profile
Seller_brIdGxsJ2XFfb
Previously, Amazon reimbursed us based on the selling price, which was fair
Ver publicación
user profile
Seller_brIdGxsJ2XFfb
I'm not even being reimbursed my true cost, let alone any profit. How is that fair or justifiable?
Ver publicación

Im not sure if it was how you were raised or where you live but your expectation of "fairness" and actions needing "justification" are detached from reality. You can like it or not like it, it doesnt matter, thats how it is. Facts dont care about feelings.

Now, that being said loss is normal in business. If you had a physical store it would be theft or fraud. When using a third party for logistics its "missing from inbound" and "lost/damaged in warehouse". This is true across the board, its not an Amazon thing, its a 3PL thing.

My recommendation is to build it into your pricing like every other retailer.

Opening multiple cases for the same issue will likely delay the issue being resolved as each subsequent issue "sends you to the back of the line" and can be viewed as manipulating the case system which can add severe delays.

00
Sigue esta conversación para recibir notificaciones cuando haya nueva actividad
user profile
Seller_Qbd0RsfZFEZBY
En respuesta a la publicación de Seller_brIdGxsJ2XFfb

user profile
Seller_brIdGxsJ2XFfb
Previously, Amazon reimbursed us based on the selling price, which was fair
Ver publicación
user profile
Seller_brIdGxsJ2XFfb
I'm not even being reimbursed my true cost, let alone any profit. How is that fair or justifiable?
Ver publicación

Im not sure if it was how you were raised or where you live but your expectation of "fairness" and actions needing "justification" are detached from reality. You can like it or not like it, it doesnt matter, thats how it is. Facts dont care about feelings.

Now, that being said loss is normal in business. If you had a physical store it would be theft or fraud. When using a third party for logistics its "missing from inbound" and "lost/damaged in warehouse". This is true across the board, its not an Amazon thing, its a 3PL thing.

My recommendation is to build it into your pricing like every other retailer.

Opening multiple cases for the same issue will likely delay the issue being resolved as each subsequent issue "sends you to the back of the line" and can be viewed as manipulating the case system which can add severe delays.

00
user profile
Seller_Qbd0RsfZFEZBY
En respuesta a la publicación de Seller_brIdGxsJ2XFfb

user profile
Seller_brIdGxsJ2XFfb
Previously, Amazon reimbursed us based on the selling price, which was fair
Ver publicación
user profile
Seller_brIdGxsJ2XFfb
I'm not even being reimbursed my true cost, let alone any profit. How is that fair or justifiable?
Ver publicación

Im not sure if it was how you were raised or where you live but your expectation of "fairness" and actions needing "justification" are detached from reality. You can like it or not like it, it doesnt matter, thats how it is. Facts dont care about feelings.

Now, that being said loss is normal in business. If you had a physical store it would be theft or fraud. When using a third party for logistics its "missing from inbound" and "lost/damaged in warehouse". This is true across the board, its not an Amazon thing, its a 3PL thing.

My recommendation is to build it into your pricing like every other retailer.

Opening multiple cases for the same issue will likely delay the issue being resolved as each subsequent issue "sends you to the back of the line" and can be viewed as manipulating the case system which can add severe delays.

00
Responder
Sigue esta conversación para recibir notificaciones cuando haya nueva actividad